Hunt ban 'a priority' for new Alliance boss
The new boss of the Countryside Alliance has said repealing the ban on hunting is a "central part" of the Alliance's work, as the battle for the hearts and minds of wavering MPs intensifies.
With both sides saying an imminent free vote on hunting was "too close to call", the Alliance's new chief executive, Alice Barnard, said they would continue to lobby for repeal.
-

Simon Hart
Both the Alliance and the League Against Cruel Sports threw a small army of campaigners at all three party conferences, and Ms Barnard said the issue was still top of the Countryside Alliance's agenda, despite the movement stepping more towards campaigning on other rural issues like affordable housing and fly-tipping.
Alice Barnard, who was the Alliance east of England officer and has a hunting background, took over from out-going chief executive Simon Hart when he was elected a Tory MP in west Wales.
She said: "Repeal of the Hunting Act is a central part of the Alliance's work and we will continue to highlight that this is a bad law in all senses, not least animal welfare.
"It is also a huge waste of police and court time.
"In this time of austerity and budget cuts, it is clear that resources would be better deployed on things which affect the wider community," she added.
"When such a vote is to take place remains to be seen when Parliament returns for autumn business.
"First, a vote will be taken on whether MPs will hold a debate on the issue at all, which will give some idea on the numbers for and against the hunt ban in the new intake of MPs."
Hunt campaign leaders have been nervous about forcing through a vote on repeal in case such a vote is lost.
Ms Barnard said she was confident the new Tory-Lib Dem Government would prove more sympathetic to rural issues than the last Labour Government.
"This year, following the formation of the coalition Government, we have new ministers in Defra and across Government departments who are not only sympathetic to our issues but also have a real understanding of the countryside, country sports and rural life," she said.
"It is encouraging that our campaigning work in all areas, such as food labelling, affordable housing, rural services, fly-tipping and education has clearly had a strong impact amongst politicians and is widely acknowledged and understood.
"The same is true with regards to the need for repeal of the Hunting Act," she added.
The anti-hunt League Against Cruel Sports were also lobbying hard at the three conferences.
"We've had an exhausting three weeks at the main political party conferences," said chief executive Douglas Batchelor.
"We have spoken to senior politicians, celebrities including Eddie Izzard, and had dozens of MPs sign our pledge against repeal of the Hunting Act," he said.
The League also presented new Defra minister Caroline Spelman with a 20,000-plus signature petition against snaring, and they co-hosted a debate at the Tory party conference with a group called Conservatives Against Fox Hunting.







5 Comments
by Caroline Campbell, UK
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 5:14PM
“I was born and brought up in the countryside, i own and compete up and down the country with several of my horses and I am apalled at the prospect of the disgusting spectacle of hunting being legalised once again. this is NOT about countryside v townies it is pure and simple animal abuse at its worst!”
by Wayne, Upper Halliford
Tuesday, October 12 2010, 7:57PM
“The Countryside Alliance should change their name because they DON'T represent the majority of the people they say they support. They are for hunting, and hunting alone. How much money did they spend promoting the repeal of the Hunting Act? How much did they spend promoting affordable housing or keeping rural post offices open? Even without the figures I think we can safely say that the majority of the money went on promoting this minority "sport" rather than saving communities.”
by E Hendry, Bath
Tuesday, October 12 2010, 7:08PM
“Yes, thank God there are probably just enough anti-hunting Tories and Lib Dems to keep this barbarity consigned to the history books. When will the CA sit up and realise that it's those OTHER countryside issues (affordable housing being the top one) that real countryside dwellers actually are concerned about, not whether sadists on horseback with rampaging dogs should be given free rein to terrorise wildlife. Just think how many supporters they would have if they just dropped this obsession with blood sports. The problem at the moment is that they are the only 'countryside' pressure group with any clout, yet their professed concern for the 'other issues' carries no weight at all when they even admit that hunting is still very much 'central' to their agenda. You only have to look at their website to see how bloodsports dominate their concerns (and, presumably, take the bulk of their donations). It's a real shame, actually.”
by mhayworth, Surrey
Tuesday, October 12 2010, 2:00PM
“Don't kid yourself Norman. The days of pretending that anti-hunt support is only left wing and urban are well and truly over. If the coalition partners don't start waking up to the anti-hunting sentiment from their own party supporters, they will never be in government again. Lets face it, they barely made it in this time even with the appalling performance of Labour.
The hunts need to stop breeding foxes with their artificial earths, drop the ludicrous pest control story, take up drag hunting and make an attempt to evolve with the rest of civilised society.”
by NORMAN BRYANT, west sussex
Tuesday, October 12 2010, 1:11PM
“Of course it requires repealing, it was brought in by a bunch of bigots who's main interest was to have a dig at the Tories than save the lives of any foxes and even then they had to mis use the Parliment Act to force it through as the House of Lords did not want this very bad law, it seems like the upper house has more sense than the Lower one,”