Gypsy site row linked to Holocaust
A row over gypsy and traveller sites sparked controversy in the council chamber this week as Conservatives were accused of “swerving close to the racist attitudes which ultimately led to the Holocaust”.
The bombshell accusation made by human rights campaigner Councillor Sarah Bevan – whose Jewish ancestors were persecuted in Nazi concentration camps – risks triggering a wave of official complaints from politicians about each others’ behaviour.
-

Ms Bevan (Lib Dem, Peasedown) attacked a move by opposition Tories to block the allocation of £1.8 million for the development of new gypsy and traveller sites in B&NES.
The Conservatives said the money could be better spent on services such as affordable housing and pointed out money was being cut from the road maintenance budget.
Ms Bevan told the meeting: “If the Conservative group en masse, as quoted by its leader in the media last week, believes that those who hold the purse strings should prioritise potholes over people, some of whom may well be members of minority groups such as the Romany, it is swerving perilously close to the kind of low level, insidious racism that ultimately led to the Holocaust.”
Her comments sparked a strong reaction from the chamber as the opposition called for her to take back the remarks.
Councillors were asked if they would like to make formal complaints about the comments and Councillor Dave Laming (Con, Lambridge) said he would be doing so.
Conservatives say the ruling Liberal Democrat administration could not justify allocating the money before a site or sites had even been identified but they failed to stop the money being included in the B&NES budget.
Mr Laming said his complaint would now be dealt with by the council’s processes.
He added: “I believe we were entitled to question why the controlling Liberal Democrat cabinet were not spending £1.8 million on affordable housing, and also thought our amendment was nothing more than common sense and logic.
“After all I have a duty of fairness to my constituents.
“It was also very disappointing that the Liberal Democrats chose to lower the tone of the debate on this with completely unfair and incorrect accusations.”
Other Liberal Democrats expressed anger at the Conservative move and Councillor Tim Ball (Lib Dem, Twerton), cabinet member for housing, said they were “irresponsible and reckless”.
After the meeting Mrs Bevan said she stood by what she had said.
No stranger to controversy, she provoked an angry backlash in 2010 after criticising the selection, by the council of which she was then chairman, of the Duchess of Cornwall as guest of honour to turn on the city’s Christmas lights.
At the meeting on Tuesday, Tory group leader Councillor Francine Haebering (Con, Saltford) said the allocation of money – to be spent over the next three financial years – was premature.
“We recognise that the council has a responsibility to search for potential sites and, if they are found, to allocate them as appropriate through the planning process. However, we currently have no sites allocated and so we question the premature timing of this proposal.
“The council is not awash with money, and £1.8 million is a very large amount when considering the council’s main priorities.
“We believe that now is the time for us to be investing in new housing and supporting local families.”
All of the broad brush proposals put forward by the council’s cabinet were agreed at the annual budget meeting, where the authority agreed a £1 million reduction in what it calls frontline services, as part of an overall £12 million savings drive.
The B&NES share of the council tax for an average Band D property will be frozen at £1,201.85.







100 Comments
View all
by eyekantspel
Monday, February 27 2012, 6:48PM
“I think the united kingdumb should ave more gypsys, more polish, more pakistanies, more indian, more and more of EVERYONE! One big happy unemployed family!”
by Charlespk
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 9:42PM
“"I've noticed in the past that no-body wants these people camping illegally but no-one wants to build a place for them either."
You've got it in one!
Is that the wide open spaces of the Emerald Isle I hear calling them?”
by bart1881
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 9:23PM
“How come councils end up with all the ne'er do wells, drop outs and don't know how to do a days work merchants.
First class at cackling, useless at doing or achieving anything.
It's a greasy path to Greece, and we're well and truly on the way.”
by PWBath
Wednesday, February 22 2012, 7:27PM
“Incredible that this woman is in politics, but then her counterparts are not much better either. The problem is that these sites are actually a good idea - those of us living near the Entry Hill site experienced increased burglary and garden theft, smoke from fires, late night music, aggressive dogs and children roaming the streets and hazards due to large (banned) vehicles using the road. This is not racism, it's experience. Call me a NIMBY (Anil will probably call me racist too) but experience shows me that it would definitely be better to find 'suitable ' (i.e. not near a built up residential area of outstanding natural beauty) location for travellers to use.”
by bart1881
Tuesday, February 21 2012, 7:58PM
“Travellers do tarmac paths very cheep.”
by bristolali
Tuesday, February 21 2012, 1:32PM
“Would they take £9100 out of said £1.8 million to put a much needed path in my local park? We are already established as a community, have been for many years(Twerton) so do you think we stand a chance?”
by Respondent
Tuesday, February 21 2012, 12:45AM
“I'm personally sympathetic to the idea of building a camp for travellers and romanies.
I've noticed in the past that no-body wants these people camping illegally but no-one wants to build a place for them either. I'm just a bit dismayed at the high cost of the build.”
by Taki123
Sunday, February 19 2012, 11:58PM
“"All 60million of us on our 60million acres of land would have freedom"
For this to happen the English would have form an English parliament in Oxford, declare independence from London, find a new King and remedy the Enclosure Acts.
All doable.”
by Viscount_V
Sunday, February 19 2012, 7:41PM
“An interesting point Aurea_Flamma. In an ideal world (certainly not our present one sadly), 70% of UK land wouldn't be privately owned by 1% of the population. Nor would 90% of the people live on just 10% of the land.
All 60million of us on our 60million acres of land would have freedom to roam and set up camp or home without having to legislate and demand provision from those clearly under the illusion that they own the soil under our feet. We would have enough land to house and feed us all more than adequately and equally.... In an ideal world.”
by aurea_flamma
Sunday, February 19 2012, 6:33PM
“I am not sure why but I am quite concerned about the prospect of concentrating Gypsies together in state organised camps.......
I guess it all comes down to perspective!”